phenomenological
investigations

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2012

Pages: 145-163

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Matthias Steup, "Belief control and intentionality", Synthese 188 (2), 2012, pp. 145-163.

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the rejection of doxastic voluntarism is not as straightforward as its opponents take it to be. I begin with a critical examination of William Alston’s defense of involuntarism and then focus on the question of whether belief is intentional.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 2012

Pages: 145-163

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Matthias Steup, "Belief control and intentionality", Synthese 188 (2), 2012, pp. 145-163.