
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2002
Pages: 98-128
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349432561
Full citation:
, "Analytical Marxism and the debate on social evolution", in: Historical materialism and social evolution, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002


Analytical Marxism and the debate on social evolution
pp. 98-128
in: Paul Blackledge, Graeme Kirkpatrick (eds), Historical materialism and social evolution, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002Abstract
According to Erik Wright, Andrew Levine and Elliott Sober (1992, 50) a theory counts as historical only when it has built into it "the idea of direction". Both Darwinism and classical historical materialism are in their view genuinely historical theories: Darwinism because it posits (in the words of one authority) that "any population (with the properties of multiplication, heredity and variation) will evolve by natural selection so as to become better adapted to its environment" (Smith 1975, 96); Marxism likewise because it portrays societies as developing so as to improve their forces of production.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2002
Pages: 98-128
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349432561
Full citation:
, "Analytical Marxism and the debate on social evolution", in: Historical materialism and social evolution, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002