
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1995
Pages: 249-264
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401065351
Full citation:
, "To show and to prove", in: Mexican studies in the history and philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 1995


To show and to prove
pp. 249-264
in: Robert S. Cohen (ed), Mexican studies in the history and philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 1995Abstract
It is often said that mathematics are a deductive science. Inasmuch as this claim puts forward its demonstrative character, it has two failures: first, it does not account for the creative or heuristic side of mathematics (for example, how are theorems discovered?); second, it omits the fact that a great part of mathematical knowledge is based upon sense evidence, not on proof. With this we mean that there are — in the last instance, for in practice the process is quite mixed — two kinds of "truth" in mathematics: those based on sense-perception and those inferred from other propositions by logical deduction. Those, we say, are shown , the latter are proven.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1995
Pages: 249-264
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401065351
Full citation:
, "To show and to prove", in: Mexican studies in the history and philosophy of science, Berlin, Springer, 1995